Thursday, September 26, 2019

Pinning Them Down in Plenitude:

Tracing Back the Blackshear Line, part 5

Census records, tax rolls, court minutes, and deeds - we've looked at enough Blackshear documents by now to get some kind of idea about the migration and financial status of Amelia Virginia's family.  We have discovered that her father, Silas, owned 166 acres in Georgia, more than enough land for subsistence farming and cash crops as well.  After selling that land, the family moved to Arkansas, but I haven't been able to find any records for them there other than the marriage record of Amelia Virginia's sister.  After only one to two years in Arkansas, Silas had some sort of tie to land in Anderson County, Texas - he didn't own it, but was either farming, leasing, or managing it.  The entire family seems to have settled in Anderson County on a permanent basis some time in 1852.  Although Silas did not report any sort of property until 1856, he must have been successfully farming before that, because in that year he was suddenly taxed for horses, oxen, hogs and slaves.  By January of 1857, Silas had acquired 1004 acres of land, which probably didn't come cheap.  Maybe he had been doing a lease-to-own type of thing, or he was making a good profit from his crops each year and saved up enough to finally purchase land.  So, for the first ten years of Amelia Virginia's life, the family seems to have been relatively prosperous.  Then, for some reason, Silas appears to have taken out a loan that he was unable to repay, and he lost his land and most of his property.

Today we are going to take another look at the deed showing the sale of Silas Blackshear's Anderson County land.  If you remember, the first half of the document was about his land being seized and liquidated to pay off his debt.  The second half gave a description of the location of his land.  For some reason, I love knowing exactly where our ancestors lived.  Maybe because it helps me to better imagine what their life was like?  Yeah, I think that's it, plus, you know, I just like being able to solve those little mysteries!

Before we read the second half of the deed, do you remember this?


Anderson County, Texas
Plenitude Postal District

Based on my sleuthing, this is the approximate area in which I figured "Plenitude" was located.  I have since discovered that the postal area of Plenitude stretched from Montalba to the eastern border of the county.  This means that our Blackshears' land could have been anywhere within that twenty mile stretch.

So let's see what the deed gives for the location of Silas' land:



And, in case you don't want to try to read the original, here is a transcription of the relevant part:

. . . Now therefore in consideration of the premises aforesaid and of the payment of the Said Sum of One Hundred and Twenty five Dollars the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged I, B. F Durham Sheriff as aforesaid have Sold and by these presents do grant and convey unto the said J J Davis all the Estate right title and interest which the Said Silas M Blacksher had on the 29th day of August A D 1860 or at any time afterwards of in and to the following described premises “Viz” One Tract of Land Situated in Anderson County on the waters of the Naches River being a part of a tract of one third of a League Patented to the heirs of W. B. Harrison Beginning at the N E Corner of Said Survey from which a Red Oak brs S 210 E 7 4/10 varas a Willow Oak brs N 45 to 5 8/10 varas both marked X Thence West 4277 varas to a Stake in the N Boundary to Said Harrison 1/3 of a League Survey from which a Post Oak 14 inches in dia brs N 55 E 7 1/10 vrs marked x a Black Oak 5 inches in diameter brs S 10 varas 7 5/10 varas marked x Thence South 1443 varas to a Stake in the South boundary of Said Survey from which a pine 20 inches in dia brs N 13 3/10 varas marked x and a Black Jack 10 inches in dia brs S (C 1) 10 51/10 Marked X Thence E 1583 varas to S E corner of Said Survey from which a pine 14 inches in dia bears S 49 W 3/10 varas and a Sweet gum bears S 30 W 6 varas Thence with the meanders of the Naches River 1615 varas to the place of beginning containing about one thousand and four acres To have and to hold the above described premises unto the Said J J Davis his heirs and assigns forever as fully and as absolutely as I as Sheriff as aforesaid can convey by virtue of Said writ of Execution – In Testimony whereof I have hereunto Set my hand this 2nd day of October A D 1860
                                                                                                                        B. F. Durham

Sheriff. A.C

When I first read this, I was thoroughly confused.  I didn't think I was going to be able to make much sense of it, but I read it about five more times and I think I kinda, sorta understand it now.  Apart from the lack of punctuation, it uses a lot of abbreviations and a word I was not familiar with.  So here is a little glossary:

brs - bears
dia - diameter
vrs - varas
varas - a Spanish yard; in Texas, equal to 33 1/3 inches

The description is further complicated by the fact that it continually refers to posts and stakes and trees, no less, and thinks we need to know the diameter of each, as if the tree was going to stay that exact same size forever (never mind the fact that it was likely to die or get cut down at some point).  If you ignore all of that, it makes a lot more sense.  It pretty much says that the land sits on the banks of the Naches River (this is a very big clue!), and is a part of a 1/3 league tract of land originally patented to W. B. Harrison.

You know what that means - map time!


Anderson County, Texas
Survey Map - 1855

This is a portion of a larger map from the Portal to Texas History website. You can find it and use the zoom feature here.  Notice the town of Palestine in the bottom left corner - that is about the middle of  Anderson County.  The highlighted portion is about twelve miles NE of Palestine.  It is labeled as "Wm B Harrison ptd" (patented?).  Not only is this the only section I found on the map that says William Harrison, but it is also bordered on the east by the Neches River (I know, the county clerk spelled it Naches), so I am 100% confident that this is the exact tract of land described in the deed.

The deed goes on to give that complicated spiel with posts and trees and bearing all different directions, which I don't really understand, but it does say at one point, "to a stake in the N Boundary" of the survey and at another, "to a stake in the South boundary of Said Survey," so it seems to stretch pretty much from top to bottom of the original survey.  Now, the original survey was 1/3 league, which is 1476 acres, so Silas did not own about 472 acres of the original survey.  I think, if I read the deed right, that it was a portion on the western end of the original tract that did not belong to him.  And, if I did my math correctly, that means he owned a little more than the eastern 2/3 of the section marked on the map.  So, on the first map I showed you, if you go straight across from the red star to the banks of the river (near the modern town of Neches), that is where the family actually lived.

In my first Blackshear post I gave a description of Anderson County that basically just said the terrain is hilly, the soil is good, and the eastern half of the county is heavily forested.  (Actually, that's exactly what I said!)  So here is a little more information, some of which came from the Genealogy Trails website, to help you get a mental picture:

The eastern half of Anderson County had rolling hills and timber land, mostly pine, but a lot of oak and other types of trees as well.  The county had an important logging and sawmill industry, and I would guess that anyone wanting to farm was going to have to clear some land first.  Maybe that's why Silas reported only 10% of his land as being improved on the 1850 agricultural census.  And maybe it also had something to do with the reason he reported such an increase in value during the last year he held on to his land.  So here are a few (modern) photos of this area, as well as photos of  some of the types of trees mentioned in the deed above:


Black Oak

Sweet Gum

Willow Oak


Neches River
 (from the Anderson County side)

And here is a photo I came across that doesn't really show us much, but I really liked it and so I thought I'd share it anyway:


This was taken in the early morning from on the river a few miles north of where our Blackshear ancestors lived.

I can just imagine a six year old Amelia Virginia tagging along behind her older brothers Seaborn (age 13) and James (age 10, if he was still living at that point) as they went down to the river to go fishing.

And while we are talking about the river, did you notice on the map that it said "Cherokee" on the other side?  That's Cherokee County, where our Cheathams were living.  So Amelia Virginia's future husband was growing up somewhere on the other side of the river at the same time.

Okay, what else?  Anderson county was full of spring-fed creeks, which means they never suffered the effects of a drought, and the climate was so mild that they had two growing seasons, which I'm sure contributed to the family's prosperity.  And also, even though it was a bit hot and humid in the summer, it was usually breezy, making the weather more than tolerable.

I have one more map to show you before we wrap things up:


Anderson County, Texas
Survey Map - 1876

This map was made about thirteen years after we last see Silas Blackshear in Anderson County.  Do you see how the town of Neches(ville) was located right by the land he had owned?  The town was created in 1872, when the railroad came through. (That's the railroad cutting very close to the (probable) border of Silas' former tract of land.  And guess who donated land for the new townsite?  J. J. Davis, the same guy who bought up Silas' land at auction.  I wonder how far ahead of construction the railroad company was trying to acquire land?  Maybe the reason we see the family disappear in 1864 had something to do with that.  Maybe Davis allowed the Blackshears to remain on the land until he was ready to sell at a profit when the route of the railroad lines was determined.  I say this because I am pretty sure that I have found evidence showing that Silas Blackshear didn't fall off the tax rolls because he had died, but instead because he had moved.

And with that being said, I'm going to wrap this up.  Next time, we will examine the probate records of Amelia Virginia's mother as well as the records from an associated court case.


                                                                                                                                            Therese


Update:  Some of the conclusions mentioned in this post later turned out to be incorrect.  The mistakes are corrected in subsequent posts, along with an explanation and documents showing how the mistake was discovered. 



Tuesday, September 17, 2019

And the Plot Thickens:

Tracing Back the Blackshear Line, part 4

Have you ever sat down to watch your favorite television show and as it begins, the main character is on his deathbed, or falling from an airplane through the sky, or is in the midst of some other catastrophe and you're like Wait a minute, did I miss something?  And then, these words appear on the screen: 36 Hours Earlier.  And then they go back in time to show you how the hero ended up in such a life-threatening situation before they reveal how he gets out of the mess.

Today's post is going to be something like that.  So, picture this:

The sheriff stands on the courthouse steps, a crowd gathered below him.  It's a muggy 82 degrees, and the men shuffle their feet impatiently as they wait for the auction to begin.  The sheriff checks his pocket watch, and at precisely 10:00 a. m. he reads out the description of the property being auctioned off - the entire property of one Silas M. Blackshear . . .

About three weeks ago I started looking for a deed to show me when Silas Blackshear actually bought his land in Anderson County Texas.   I had to go to a Family History Center because the only Anderson County records available online are in locked files on the FamilySearch website.  So I started going through the index to deeds, which was transcribed (sigh!)  and didn't find a single one listing his name in the Grantee column.  I found one listing for his name on the Grantor side:



I saw that his land was sold at a sheriff's sale, so I thought, Oh great, another ancestor who didn't pay his property taxes!  Fortunately, whoever transcribed the index got the information right for this one, and the record book was not missing from the online database, so it was easy to get a copy of the deed.  And that, my dear family and friends, is when the plot began to thicken.






You can click on the title and enlarge the images if you would like to read it that way, or you can just read my transcription.  Here is the first section, which actually runs onto the second page:
B. F. Durham
                  Sheriff
           To          Deed
          J. J. Davis                                 
The State of Texas
           County of Anderson      
Know all men by these presents that whereas by virtue of a certain execution issued out of the District Court of Anderson County in favor of Wm G Lane and against Silas M Blacksher and James S Hanks on a certain judgement rendered on the 22nd day of April A D 1859 and directed and delivered to me as Sheriff of Anderson County commanding me of the goods and chattels land and tenements of the Said Silas M Blacksher and James S Hanks to make certain monies therein Specified I, B. F Durham Sheriff as aforesaid did upon the 29th day of August A D 1860 (?) on and seize all the right title and interest which the Said Defendant Silas M Blacksher on the 29th day of August A D 1860 had in and to the premises herein after described and on the First Tuesday in October A D 1860 within the hours prescribed by Law Sold Said premises at public vendue in the County of Anderson at the Door of the Court House thereof having first given public notice of the time and place of Such Sale by causing an advertisement thereof to be posted up at three public places of Said County one of which was the Court House thereof for Twenty days pervious to Said Sale and whereas at the Said Sale the Said premises were Struck off to J J Davis for the sum of One Hundred and twenty five dollars he being the highest bidder therefor and that being the highest Secured bid for the Same Now therefore in consideration of the premises aforesaid and of the payment of the Said Sum of One Hundred and Twenty five Dollars the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged I, B. F Durham Sheriff as aforesaid have Sold and by these presents do grant and convey unto the said J J Davis all the Estate right title and interest which the Said Silas M Blacksher had on the 29th day of August A D 1860 or at any time afterwards of in and to the following described premises “Viz”. . . .

I'm sorry about the complete lack of punctuation - I read somewhere that when transcribing an old letter or document, you are supposed to spell, capitalize, and punctuate the transcription exactly like the original.  Well, the county clerk apparently didn't believe in punctuation, so that's what we've got to work with!

Okay.  This was not a tax sale.  It appears that great great (great) granddaddy and one of his friends (business partner?  just some other guy in town?) were sued by one William G. Lane and lost the case, and the judge decreed that all of his land and property would be sold at auction to satisfy what he owed.  Woah.  His land.  His house.  His slaves.  His barn, shed, slave shack, chicken coop, wagon, cattle, horses, tools, tack, furniture, you name it - everything on the premises was sold out from under him.  The only things the family would have been able to keep would have been anything he could claim belonged to his children as a part of their inheritance from his deceased wife (I know, we haven't talked about that yet.  It's coming up next time!)

Unfortunately, unlike our favorite television hero, Silas Blackshear would not manage to get out of his sticky situation.  But how did he end up there in the first place?

Ten Years Earlier

The first we see of our Blackshears in Texas was in 1850.  If you remember, Silas appeared on the agricultural schedule for Beat 5 - Plenitude, Anderson County, Texas.  This is the same location in which the whole family appeared on the 1860 census, and also in which the land in the deed above was located.  (Whether it was the exact same piece of land or not, we don't know for sure - as you will see in a bit, the land in the deed was more acreage than what was reported on the agricultural schedule.)  The census records do not make it clear whether or not he actually owned the land he was farming in 1850.  It allowed the name of the "owner, agent, or manager" to be recorded, so it is possible that Silas was leasing the land, or was a sharecropper.

Whether or not Silas was residing in Texas on a permanent or semi-permanent basis during the time the 1850 census was taken is also unclear.  He was reported as the head of household in Arkansas, but the more census records I look at, the more problems I seem to find with them.  Remember, the agricultural schedule was supposed to report what he harvested during the entire year prior to June of 1850, so it's possible that he was already in Texas as early as the spring of 1849, since he would have had to plant and grow anything that was harvested in the second half of that year.  (Unless, of course, he had somebody else actually working the land for him.)

What is clear, however, is that the rest of the family was in Arkansas until at least November 13, 1850, since that is the day the census taker recorded their family's data. We don't know when they actually left Arkansas and joined him in Texas (or when they all left, if he was actually in Arkansas and had somebody else working the farm in Texas).  They were definitely there by January of 1853, because that is when his son Simeon was born.

So, with a ten year gap before the next census date and no deed to show what Silas might have been up to, how are we going to find out what was going on prior to 1860?  Well, let's start with the tax rolls.

In 1850, 1851, and 1852 there are no Blackshears on the tax rolls for Anderson County, Texas.  (This makes me think that maybe Silas wasn't residing in Texas at all, or at least not full time during those years, despite being on the agricultural schedule in 1850.)  In the years we are looking at right now, citizens were supposed to make their own report between January and May, indicating their status and property as of January 1st.  Silas Blackshear first appears on the 1853 tax roll, which means he could have been there as early as spring of 1852.

Let's see what the 1853 tax rolls show us about him:



I highlighted Silas' name so you could find it more easily. (In hindsight, telling you all to count 13 lines up, etc. on the ones for W. C. Cheatham probably wasn't the best way to go about things!)  Anyway, this document tells us pretty much nothing.  Silas didn't report owning any land, nor did he report owning any property.  These tax rolls didn't have any unrendered pages, so it doesn't look like the assessor was too concerned about finding people who didn't report or who may have under-reported their property.  So I suppose there is a chance that this isn't an entirely accurate account of what he owned.

Here are the tax records for the next four years:
















Well, these all look pretty much alike, don't they?  Still no land, still no property.  In 1858, though, things start to get interesting.

Silas is actually on two different pages in the 1858 tax book, neither of which appear to actually be for 1858:







If you look at the top of the page for the first one, you will see that this is page A46, and it says that it is made for the year 1857.  Now I want you to notice how the names on the page begin with multiple letters of the alphabet.  A lot of the tax records that I've looked at for Texas will have a couple of pages like this at the end, with people who for whatever reason were not put on the list in the original alphabetical pages.  Now look over in the left hand margin - it looks like the numbers 456 and 457 next to Silas' name (Oops, forgot to mention that he's listed twice).  If you look all the way to the last few names on the page, you can see that this is really 1856 and 1857, with the first number cut off and poor penmanship making it almost undecipherable.  All of this tells me a couple of things - first, that this page may have actually come out of the 1857 book.  The 1858 records not only had twice as many pages scanned as the 1857 book, but many of its pages are out of order and there are two different assessors' names written at the top.  Another theory is that the earlier tax records needed to be corrected, so some people were reassessed during 1858.

So what does this page tell us about Silas Blackshear?  It tells us that in 1856, he still didn't own any land.  He did, however, have two slaves, three horses, and some oxen and hogs, all worth $2050.  In 1857, he was reported as owning 1004 acres of land, with a value of $1255.  And in addition to the slaves, horses, oxen, and hogs, he also had 15 head of cattle.  Not too shabby.  Those 1004 acres covered a square mile and a half!

Now look at the second page.  This one says that it is also for the years 1856 and 1857.  The top of the page lists people owning land in other counties, or residing in other counties - if you look at the heading you can see that it was changed and then crossed out - apparently the assessor didn't know what he was doing.  I didn't even notice at first, probably because I was focusing on looking for Silas' name, but the whole bottom portion of this page has two big X's across it.  It actually says exactly the same thing as the first page, which, by the way, was filled out by a different assessor.

Funny thing, though, there is no page that shows Silas for 1858.  Huh.  At least now we know when he acquired his land.  (Oh, and who the original owner was.  Maybe I can go through the deed index again and actually find the deed now.)

So, how about 1859?

Once again, we see Silas on two separate pages:







On the first page, we see Silas with slightly less land, the same three horses, one more head of cattle, and a slightly lower value placed on his oxen and hogs.  No slaves.

On the second page, we see Silas listed as "Guardian for Children."  This is where the two slaves were listed as property.  So we know that Amelia Virginia's mother had already died before January 1, 1859, and the slaves were apparently owned by her, since we see them belonging to the children now, and not Silas.

We are going to take a pause from the tax rolls now, because we have made it to 1859 - and April of that year is when the judgement against Silas was pronounced.  Here is a copy of the index page in which the case is listed:



This index actually shows two cases against S. M. Blackshear and J. S. Hanks, brought by three different people.  The deed we saw above was for the second case, brought against them by William Lane.  What was the connection between Silas and Mr. Hanks?  I don't know.  The 1860 census records say that Hanks was a very prosperous farmer; the 1850 census has his occupation listed as merchant.  I found some sites online that said he was a Colonel in the U. S. (and later Confederate) Army, was an officer in the Masonic lodge, was a trustee on the board of the Mound Prairie Institute (the private school in Anderson County prior to public schools being established), and was a surveyor and later, state legislator.  I also discovered that he co-owned a steam powered foundry (and sawmill?) in the Plenitude area (the records are really unclear on this point).  And, while looking through the index to deeds, I noticed that his name came up a lot.  But what was his connection to Silas Blackshear and what did they do to anger not one, but three different people, none of whom show up in the 1860 census records for Anderson County?!?!

Let's look at the first case:



(If you want the original document in its entirety, click on the title.)  This doesn't really tell us anything, other than that the plaintiffs were supposed to post money to cover the cost of the lawsuit.  If you notice, these two guys were suing J. S. Hanks twice, once with Silas Blackshear and once with another person.  The top of the page had this dated as the Spring Term of 1859.  That's all, so we don't know how long the case dragged out before the judgement on April 22nd.

And then, the conclusion of the case:


Anderson County
Civil Court Minutes, 1859
Taylor & Radden vs. S. M. Blackshear & J. S. Hanks
(Book E pgs 401 & 402)

To be honest, I was very disappointed by this.  It tells us that Silas Blackshear was served notice to appear in court, but that he didn't show up, causing him to lose the case.  The judgement was that his assets be liquidated to cover the amount that he and James Hanks owed - $359.07 plus 10% interest and all court costs.  What it doesn't tell us is why he owed that money.  Did he and J. S. Hanks take out a loan for a business venture?  Did they get a mortgage together to purchase land or equipment?  I'm guessing that this doesn't tell us because it is just the minutes, not the actual case papers.  Unfortunately for us, when whoever it was who made the decision of what records to put on microfilm, they chose to only do the case papers dealing with divorces, guardianship, partitions of estates, naturalization, and a couple of other things, but not cases where people were just suing each other over business transactions.  I'm guessing that the original case papers might still be in the Anderson County court house archives.

And here is the second case:



Okay, just another order for the plaintiff to put up costs.

And the conclusion to this one:


Anderson County
Civil Court Minutes, 1859
W. G. Lane vs. S. M. Blackshear & J. S. Hanks
(Book E pgs 405 & 406)

Once again, Silas and Mr. Hanks failed to show up in court and therefore lost the case, with the judgement being a liquidation of their assets to cover their debt of $629.63 plus 8% interest plus court costs.  (And since I didn't put the whole page up, you didn't get to see the fact that Mr. Hanks actually received the same judgement on three separate court cases brought by W. G. Lane, with three separate co-defendants on the same day!)

I tried to find out something more about the three men who were the plaintiffs in these cases, and would you believe, I couldn't find anything at all about any of them anywhere in Texas!  Also, the court minutes say they appeared "by their attorney."  This makes me think that they were out-of-towners who came in and offered loans.

So, all together, Silas owed (together with J. S. Hanks) $988.70 plus interest for who knows how many years.  And all of his property sold at auction for $125.  All of his property, which according to his estimate on the 1859 tax rolls was actually worth $3,520 (and how much do you want to bet that was a low-ball figure?).  When I first saw that his property sold for so little, I was like, I would have been outraged!  But then again, it could have been some consolation after losing everything he owned that the investors didn't get back what they loaned him in the first place!

Okay, so Silas had everything sold at auction.  No triumphant hail Mary salvation for him.  So then what?  Well, 1860 rolls around and he is still in Anderson County, still farming, and as far as we can tell, maybe even still on the same piece of land:



In 1860 we see Silas Blackshear with the exact same piece of land, but now with a value of $3,612 - more than double what it was valued at the year before.  We also see that the slaves were under his name alone instead of as guardian for his children.  In case any of you forgot - just like I did even as I was writing this (ha!) - even though the court case was decided in April of 1859, for some reason the property wasn't seized until August 29, 1860, and the auction didn't take place until October.  That is why we see him with all of the same property!

It is also why, on the 1860 census, which was recorded a mere eight days before the sheriff seized his assets, he was still showing a value for land and property as well.   So, at least he and his children were not kicked off their land for more than a year after the judgement.  I would think that would have given him time to figure something out.  Let's see what the 1861 tax rolls show:



No land, but still about the same number of horses and cattle, and about two-thirds of the value in personal property.  So he didn't lose everything.  Or, he was able to buy some of it back from the guy who won the auction (or he sneakily moved his livestock off of his property before the sheriff came and seized everything "in and to the premises" on August 29th).  Maybe he was even able to lease back the land and house so they didn't have to move.  In any case, it doesn't seem to have been a complete and utter disaster for the family.  (I just discovered that I didn't highlight this properly - the line just below shows him as guardian of the children, still with the two slaves.)

Now for 1862:



Still no property, no horses, the same number of cattle, some sheep, and one slave, but now the slave was listed as his own property, not as belonging to his children's estate.  He must have sold one of the slaves for some reason.

1863 is the last year we see Silas Blackshear on the tax rolls for Anderson County:



1863 had a weirdly abbreviated form where they tried to squeeze two pages worth of information on one page.  This means that they lumped the value of all property together.  We can still see that he didn't own any land, but he reported a total property value of $3,195 which was considerably more than the year before.  Almost as much as he had before his assets were seized, in fact, so I don't know how he managed that!

And then, the whole family pretty much drops off the radar until the children are grown.  And it's not just because the next several years are missing from the records - they're not.  Silas Blackshear just isn't there.  Most people assume that he disappears because he died, which then leads me to ask a whole lot of new questions.  But we'll get to that another day.

And I know that we never looked back at the second part of the deed I showed you at the beginning of this post - it gives a legal description of exactly where Silas Blackshear's land was located, which means we would have to switch gears and look at more maps, and this post has already gotten pretty long, so I think I will just make that into a little bonus post that I will put up next week.


                                                                                                                                            Therese


By the way, all of these documents will eventually be put up on the Blackshear document page, but if you would rather download them now, you can copy the highlighted version by right-clicking the image itself, or download the original by left-clicking on the title underneath!  (Likewise, you can get the cropped version by clicking on the image - the ones that come from two different pages can have the entire page downloaded by clicking on the page number in the title.)


Update:  Some of the conclusions drawn in this post later turned out to be incorrect.  The mistakes are corrected in subsequent posts, along with an explanation and documents showing how the mistake was discovered. 


Tuesday, September 3, 2019

Looking for Land Records:

Tracing Back the Blackshear Line, part 3


Today we are going to look at land records and see if they can tell us anything new about the Silas Blackshear family.

I love getting my hands on deeds, because they usually tell you exactly where a person lived (assuming you can unravel the description), can give you hints as to when a person arrived or moved away from a specific town, and will often give an indication of how wealthy (or not) a person was.  I'm going to lump the tax records in here also, since they can tell us if a person owned land (and, if so, how much), approximately where a person lived (sometimes, actually, down to the lot number if in a town), as well as in which years they were living or owning property there.  We are also going to be looking at some maps, because, hey, I love maps!  (They can give us a lot of information as well as being just fun!)

Before we get into the actual documents, though, I want to review what we have learned about the family so far.  When I did my posts on W. C. Cheatham, I waited until the very end to pull things together, and then I had to go back and read through all nineteen posts to pull out all the information that I couldn't keep track of in my head.  Since I will be making a family data sheet and timeline for Silas Blackshear as well, I figured I'd try doing it as we go along.

Silas Malone Blackshear
Timeline
(1st draft)

Dates
Event

Source
c. 1811-1814
Birth – (Twiggs County), Georgia

1,2,6
1830
Residence – Houston County, Georgia

1
c.1833
Marriage to Sophena (Garrett)

5,7
c.1834
Birth of daughter, Frances Angelina

3,5,7,8
c.1835-1839
(Birth of son, name unknown)

2
c.1837
Birth of daughter, Samantha

3,8
c.1839
Birth of daughter, Melvina

3,4
1840
Residence – Stewart County Georgia (20th district)

2
c.1840
Birth of daughter, Louisa

3,4
c.1842
Birth of son, Seaborn Quincy

3,4
c.1845
Birth of son, James M.

3
Bef. 1850
(Death of son, name unknown)

3
1850
Residence – Franklin Township, Union County, Arkansas

3
c.1849
Birth of daughter, Amelia Virginia

3,4
c. 1853
Residence – Plenitude, Anderson County, Texas

5
c.1853
Birth of son, Simeon Marshall

4
c.1856
Birth of son, Harrison Malone

4
Bef. 1860
Death of son, James M.

4
c.1856-1860
Death of wife, Sophena

4,5

 Sources

1.  1830 census
2.  1840 census
3.  1850 census
4.  1860 census
5.  Extrapolation based on ages and locations given in census
6.  Extrapolation based on formation of counties in Georgia
7.  Scarborough family record
8.  Marriage records

(And once again, for some reason when I copied the table above out of a word document it did the funny thing with the lines.  So we'll just have to try our best to ignore that, yeah?)

I added the sources over on the right-hand side, because I think it is helpful to document where the information came from (you know, so you don't have to say what was I thinking?!)  I didn't do this on W. C. Cheatham's timeline - I just listed all the sources at the bottom - but I'm going to go back and do a revised timeline like this one that I'll eventually put up on his page as well.

So, that's what we have for the family so far.  I put the circa mark in front of most of the dates because, based on the sources we've looked at, some of them could be a year earlier or later.

Okay.  Land records.  As it turns out, looking for Blackshear land records was a frustrating endeavor.  You get lucky researching a particular person or place, and you expect to easily find all kinds of stuff for your next line of research.  Instead, you find every family member except the one you want, you discover that a county courthouse and all its records burned down, you learn that counties were divided into other counties, which were divided into other counties, and to top it off, half the records you want to look at are not available online, and the ones that are have random deed books missing from the collections.  So I think we are going to narrow things down today, but still be left without a lot (if any) definitive answers.

I want to start at the top of the timeline, which would be Silas Blackshear's birth.  Silas reported on the census that he was born in Georgia and he was living in Houston County in 1830.  I think most people are saying he was born is Houston County then, because that is the earliest record we have for him.  (Well, that and the fact that the Blacksheariana printed that information!)  But if you remember, Houston County wasn't created until 1821.  I chose Twiggs County as his maybe birth place, then, because - well, to tell you the truth, I saw that a few people had put that on their Blackshear trees.  Since Twiggs was on the frontier at the time, and Houston County would be formed adjoining it, that seems to make sense.  Of course, at this point we have no actual proof that this is true.  He could have very well been born in some other county that existed during his birth year.

So I said to myself, well, maybe I can find some sort of land document showing where they lived between 1811 and 1814, which is the range of years we get from the different ages on three of the census records.   I decided to start with Twiggs County.  Do we have any proof that Silas' family ever actually lived there?

Well, Ancestry has a collection of Georgia Tax Digests, and they have the Twiggs County ones for the years 1818, 1826, 1830, 1833, and 1853.  I looked through the first four (since the family was in Texas by 1853), and found Silas' father, Jacob, only in the year 1818:



You will see a Randal Blackshear five lines down from the top.  This is one of Jacob Blackshear's nephews.  Jacob is four lines up from the bottom.  (Incidentally, Jacob's brother, son, and three nephews were all found in the 1818 tax rolls for Twiggs County.)  So we know that the family was in Twiggs County when Silas was a child, but we don't know how early they arrived, since this is the earliest tax record available.  I would have loved to look through deed records for Twiggs, but since their courthouse burned down in 1901, all that is left of the early deeds is a few random abstracts.

However, Twiggs County was created in 1809 from Wilkinson County.  (Wilkinson had been created in 1803 from Creek lands.)  If they were already in Georgia prior to 1809 and lived on land that would later become Twiggs County, there should be some kind of record from Wilkinson County, right?

Now, here is a little history lesson:

Prior to 1803, vacant lands in Georgia were given out through headright grants.  Basically, that means that (originally) the governor, and later a land court, could give land to anyone that was found deserving.  They needed to do this because they had a lot of trouble getting anyone to want to come to Georgia!  Anyway, when it was in the hands of the governor, it became quite a corrupt practice, hence the establishment of the land courts.  In 1803, new lands were acquired from the Creek Indians, and the Land Lottery Act was passed.  The first two land lotteries were in 1805 and 1807, and gave out lands in what became Wilkinson and Baldwin Counties (see interactive map).  Each time more lands were ceded to Georgia, another lottery was held.

According to the University System of Georgia - Georgia Archives:

Land Lottery Records
Eight times between 1805 and 1833 Georgia held lotteries to distribute land, the largest held in the United States. The lotteries followed a simple pattern: The General Assembly passed an act that authorized the lottery and spelled out who would be eligible to participate and the grant fees that would apply.
  • The land to be distributed was surveyed and laid out in districts and lots. The surveyors sent the district and lot numbers to the governor’s office.
  • Eligible citizens registered their names in their county of residence. The names were sent to the governor’s office at the state capital. Beginning with the second lottery the names were copied onto slips of paper called “tickets” and placed in a large drum called a “wheel.”
  • District and lot numbers were placed in a separate wheel. (At first, blank tickets were added to this wheel, so that the number of tickets would equal the number of persons drawing.)
  • Commissioners appointed by the governor drew a name ticket from one wheel and a district/lot ticket from the other wheel. If the district/lot ticket was blank, the person received nothing. If the ticket contained a district/lot number, the person received a prize of that parcel of land. A ticket that contained a number was called a “Fortunate Draw.” With later lotteries (after 1820), when blank tickets were not added to the prize wheel, individuals whose names remained in the second wheel were considered to have drawn blanks.
  • Anyone who received a Fortunate Draw could take out a grant for the lot he drew, after paying the grant fee. If he did not take out a grant, the lot reverted back to the state to be sold to the highest bidder.
So, who was entitled to enter the drawing in the first lottery?

Person Entitled to Draw
  • Bachelor, 21 years or over, 1 year residence in Georgia, citizen of United States – 1 draw
  • Married man with wife and/or child, 1 year residence in Georgia, citizen of United States – 2 draws
  • Widow with child under 21 years, 1 year residence in Georgia – 2 draws
  • Orphan or family of orphans under 21 years, with father dead and mother dead or remarried – 1 draw
I didn't find anything for Jacob in the first two lotteries, but I did discover that two of his brothers, a first cousin, and two other relatives all lived in Washington County, Georgia and registered for the land lottery of 1805 - which means that they were already in Georgia by 1804 at the latest.  Of course, that isn't proof that Jacob was also there, but the last record we find of him in North Carolina is for the 1801 sale of land that he had inherited from his grandmother, so it makes sense that he would have moved at the same time as his other relatives.

One of Jacob's relatives was a fortunate drawer in the first lottery.  (I found this transcription of results online - I think this is probably a brother.) 

I also looked through the indexes on the FamilySearch website and was able to find a land grant for Jacob's brother Moses from the 1807 (second) lottery.  It is for land in Wilkinson County, and is dated 1811 (sometimes it took awhile for the fortunate drawers to actually get the deed to their land).  Now here is the interesting thing:  the grant shows that Moses got 202 1/2 acres, comprising lot 2 of district 28 in Wilkinson County.  This portion would later be sectioned off as a part of the new Twiggs County in 1809.  If we look back at the Twiggs County tax records for 1818, we see that all of those Blackshear families were living in either district 27 or 28.  Take a look at this map:



The blue shows the original boundaries of Wilkinson County.  The yellow shows the portion that later became Twiggs.  The red shows district 27 (where Jacob's two nephews lived), and the green shows district 28 (where his brother and son lived).  The little red circle in the corner of the green section shows the land of Moses Blackshear.

So, what does any of this have to do with Jacob, or for that matter, Silas, which is who we are really supposed to be talking about here?

Take a look at the top portion of the 1818 Twiggs County Tax Digest:


The headings are:  Name, Land (1, 2, 3, P), d., (something illegible), County, Waters & Bounds, (something that could be an S or an f, depending on which page you look at), $, and cents (I think!).

Now look at what was recorded for Jacob:


Nothing is recorded except the tax amount.  That means that, although he was living in Twiggs County, he did not own any land anywhere in Georgia in 1818.  (Taxes were paid in the county in which one lived, regardless of where their land was.)

I originally thought that maybe Jacob had purchased land at some point after the lottery and I just couldn't find the deed (you should see the indexes in those deed books!).  But once I discovered that he didn't actually own land there, I had a new thought.  What if he and his family were living on his brother's land?  We don't know if he was in district 27 or 28 - most of the people in Captain Jefferson's district lived in one or the other.

And speaking of tax districts, you can completely ignore the fact that it says "Captain Jefferson's District" - that just means that a Mr. Jefferson was the captain of the militia for that area in that year.  The tax rolls were based on the militia rosters, so every time a new militia captain was elected, there would be a new name on the tax rolls!  (Eventually somebody realized that this was a ridiculous system and gave all of the tax/militia districts a number.  The districts we are talking about now, though, are the original land survey districts.)

Anyway, Jacob's brother Moses did have 202 1/2 acres.  Since an average family with several sons could only work 40 to 80 acres back then, both families living on the same land would be a plausible scenario.  (Of course, Moses could have had slaves, but I don't have any evidence one way or another about that, and even if he did have a few, that doesn't mean his land still wouldn't support his brother's family as well.)

I came across another possible scenario yesterday.  In their paper, "Land Openings on the Georgia Frontier...", Bleakley and Ferrie explain that
Decades after the land opening, it may have been more difficult to locate a lot's owner....Using the state-disseminated lists to find a winner who wanted to sell might be easy in the lottery's immediate aftermath, but those lists would become dated rather quickly in a period of high westward migration. Nevertheless, the low cost to claim land winnings motivated most lottery winners to take formal possession of their lot. But even owners who developed their lot may have become impossible to find if they subsequently abandoned their land.  Roger Ransom (2005) dubbed this period the era of "walk away farming," in which it was commonplace for farmers to simply leave their land in response to bad shocks. Obviously you cannot negotiate with a neighbor that you cannot find, and such `walk away' neighbors would retain de jure ownership of their lot for some time. A farmer who wanted to expand onto this abandoned land could do so with some hope of eventually acquiring title, but this was not without risk.
(Wow.  I feel like I just wrote a paper for college!)  So I suppose it is possible that Jacob's family was living on land that for whatever reason was unoccupied (which is to say, squatting).

Anyway . . .  after all that, I would say that Jacob Blackshear could have been living in Wilkinson County prior to 1809, and even if he arrived in Georgia later - like maybe after his father's death (between 1808 and 1810) - was probably living near his brother Moses in Twiggs County before 1811, which means that I'm pretty confident that Silas Blackshear was born in Twiggs County!

Regardless of when they arrived, we know for a fact that the family was in Twiggs County in 1818, but we don't know how long they stayed, since there is a gap in the tax lists until 1826, at which point we no longer find them there.  By 1830, they were living in Houston County (marked in purple on the map above).

I looked in an index of deeds for Houston County for the years 1823-1943 on FamilySearch, thinking maybe I could find a land deed showing when they arrived.  The index was obviously copied from all of the original deed indexes, because it had thousands of names, was only vaguely alphabetical, and jumped around all over the place with the years (very few of which were in the first two decades after the county was formed).  Houston County deed books E, F, G, H, and I were also available online, and I checked all of those indexes as well, but none of my searching turned up a Jacob Blackshear.  (Volumes A-D have no indexes, so that is like more than a thousand deeds I would have to look through, which I have not had time to do yet.)

Those were the only Houston County land records available online, so I just did a general internet search for Blackshear land records and managed to find this transcription of fortunate drawers in the 1821 land lottery:


And later down the list:


This shows Jacob's son Enoch, living in Twiggs County in 1821, drawing land in both Houston and Monroe Counties.  (I haven't come across any evidence that either Jacob or Enoch ever lived in Monroe County, so I only marked the Houston County lot on the map above.)

While I was at the Family History Center I checked the Houston County 1821 land lottery grants. Those records showed that Enoch's land was finally granted in 1829.  (They sure had to wait a long time to get title to their land, didn't they?)  This grant gave him title, so there wouldn't be an original deed in the county deed books showing him purchasing the land.  The lot was 202 1/2 acres.

Why might this be relevant?  Well, the Blacksheariana references a 1903 work that says Jacob did not appear on the Twiggs County tax list for 1826 and that he had probably gone on to Houston County to hold the land for his son until he was granted title.  Apparently this was a common thing to do during that time.  It would make sense, especially because Jacob didn't seem to have owned any of his own land.  (Wait.  I just noticed from my notes that Enoch doesn't appear in the Twiggs County tax lists in 1826 or 1830 either, so maybe they went on to the new land together.)

We know for certain that Jacob was living in Houston County in 1830 (both he and Enoch appear in Houston County on the 1830 census, but since they are listed two pages apart, were probably not living on the same piece of land by then), and now we see that it is possible that they actually began living there as early as 1821 (the year of the land lottery), and - dare we say likely? - that they were in Houston County by 1826.

So.  Houston County.  Tax lists are available online for the years 1829, 1831, 1835, 1837, 1839, 1846, and a few later years.  Since 1829 is the earliest, there is no way to test our theories about when they may have arrived there.  I found Jacob only on the 1829 tax list:



We can see Jacob eleven names down.  The headings this time are Pine Lands, Oak & Hickory, Quality, County, District, Numbers, Stock in Trade, Town Lots & Value, Gigs & Carriages, Stallions, Poles, Slaves, Dollars, and Cents.

This makes it look like Jacob owned 202 1/2 acres of pine lands in Lee County.  But if you go back to the previous pages, you can see that the tick marks don't always make sense as meaning "same as above."  Most of the time they make more sense as meaning "none."  On top of that, he only owed 62 1/2 cents for his taxes, which is the same amount as everyone else with a whole row of tick marks.  The people who actually had land or gigs or slaves owed more than that.

Take a look at the very top of the page where it tells the tax/militia district.  It says that this is a list of defaulters.  Now, that doesn't necessarily mean that he didn't pay his taxes.  According to the Georgia Archives website,
A list of persons owing taxes was often included at the end of the tax digests. These lists were usually published in a local newspaper, as well. Sometimes the lists were published before the tax deadline, and are really lists of persons who had not yet filed their returns, as opposed to actual defaulters. There were several ways a person could be listed as a defaulter:

1. The taxpayer had moved out of the geographical area of the militia (tax) district.
2. The person reported as a defaulter was under age. The captain’s tax list was often formulated from lists of men registered for militia duty. Such lists included the age group 16-20, which was not subject to taxation.
3. The person actually defaulted (failed to pay their taxes).
4. The person was absent from the area.
5. The person was listed as a taxpayer and a defaulter in the same district. This situation may have resulted from non-standardized spelling.
    I don't think he had moved away, because he would be on the census in Houston County the very next year.  He wasn't under age.  He wasn't listed twice.  That means he either didn't pay, or had yet to pay, his taxes, or he was absent from the area.  Remember, he wasn't in the 1831 or later tax lists from Houston County, so maybe he was off for a bit scoping out the place they would move to by the end of the following year.  Enoch appeared in 1831 and 1835, and then he sold two 202 1/2 adjoining land lots in 1836 (one of which he obtained from the 1821 land lottery, and the other was listed in the 1830 tax digest as belonging to his brother John!  I have a copy of the deed - if anyone wants it, let me know.)  And that is the last record for him in Houston County as well.

    By 1840, Jacob was living in his son Silas' household in Stewart County.  So where was he in the decade before that?  And where was Silas between the year when he got married (1833 or 1834) and 1840?  Maybe they headed off to Stewart County right after the 1830 census was taken.

    Stewart County is way over on the western border of Georgia, outlined in orange on my map.  (Here is a map link if you want to look at it again, but don't want to lose your place while reading!)  Created in 1826, it was originally a part of Lee County.  Districts 1-13 of Lee were given out in the 1827 lottery.  (I couldn't find anything online telling when districts 17-22 were given out.)  Of course I looked through the indexes of the land lottery grants for Lee County.  I didn't find any Blackshears at all, so maybe Jacob purchased some land there from a lottery winner.  The other land lottery grants I looked at show that it took about six to eight years before a fortunate drawer actually received title to their land.  In the case of Lee County, that would put it at about 1833.  That is only a couple of years later than Jacob disappeared from the Houston County tax rolls, making it a plausible scenario if the land had been one of the first lots given title or if they had sped up the process by then.

    So, did I look in the Stewart County deed records to check my idea?  You know I did!  They were a bit of a mess, though (I'll bet you aren't surprised).  There was a file labeled Books A & B that had indexes for A and B, but also seemed to have deeds from books C without an index.  There were also files with books D&E, F&H, J&K, L&P, Q&R, and S&T.  Those all had indexes, which I checked.  Books G, I, L, M, N, & O were nowhere to be found.  I never did find a record of Jacob or Silas purchasing any land in Stewart County, but I suppose the deed may have been in one of those missing books (one-third of them were missing, so it wouldn't be surprising).  I found deeds all over the place (both buying and selling land) for Silas' brother John, though.  Maybe he was the reason they moved out there in the first place.

    (Guess what?  As if all of this wasn't complicated enough already,  I discovered just now that the Blacksheariana reports that John held nearly 400 acres of land in Houston County back in 1830, even though he himself was living in a different county.  So maybe Jacob was living on his land, instead of on Enoch's.  I'll bet if I went back and found all of his deeds - which I most likely won't because that would take a very long time - I would discover that he sold that land around the time Jacob quit living there.)

    When I hit this point in my research I was feeling pretty good about what I'd managed to find.  Although I still didn't have any definite answers, a possible picture was forming that looked like this:

    Silas Blackshear

    c. 1811-1814           born in Twiggs Co., GA
        1818-1820       age 4-9, living in household of father in Twiggs, Co., GA (confirmed)
    c. 1821-1826          age 10-15, living in household of father, Jacob.  Moved to Houston Co., GA.
        1829/1830      age 15 to 19, living in household of father in Houston Co., GA (confirmed)
    c. 1831                     age 17 to 20, living in household of father, Jacob.  Moved to Stewart Co., GA
    c. 1833-1834          age 19 to 23, marriage, living in Stewart Co., Georgia
        1840/41            age 26 to 29, head of household, in Stewart Co., GA (confirmed)

    And then . . . then I came across a record of the third land lottery, the one before the one for Houston County, held in 1820 and giving out land in a handful of counties that, as far as we know, none of our Blackshears were ever connected to.

    The following list came from a website titled "1820 Twiggs Land Lottery."  That makes absolutely no sense, so what it must really mean, is the list of Twiggs residents who were fortunate drawers in the 1820 lottery.

    This is the top portion of the list, so you can see the column headings:


    And later down the list:


    Jacob Blackshear drew one lot in Irwin County (shown outlined in pink at the bottom of the map).  I tried looking in the indexes on FamilySearch for early deeds and mortgages in Irwin County and didn't find any Blackshears.   But I did find a book on the HathiTrust website, published in 1850 - something called A Copy of the Original List of the Drawing of "Old Irwin County"... (The title actually has more than an additional 50 words!) by B. B. De Graffenried.  It is a listing of everyone who drew lots, where they lived, the date they received the grant, as well as which lots never had the fee paid and reverted back to the state (shown in italics).



    So there, number 96 on the list, we see Jacob Blackshear, living in Twiggs County, finally receiving land from the 1820 lottery in December of 1834 - fourteen years after the drawing (?!?!).  The interesting thing is, Jacob's name on this list is not in italics.  That means his lands did not revert.  That means he paid the $18 (equivalent to just under $400 today) fee and got 490 acres of land!

    But, you might be asking, if Jacob Blackshear won land in Irwin County, why don't we ever see him living there?  Well, according to one website:
    Most winners never saw the lots they won but sold out to speculators who in turn sold the lots to other families, many of whom had just arrived in Georgia. Consequently valuable genealogical information on the winners or their heirs can, at times, be found in the recorded deeds of the counties where the land lots existed, even when the winners lived elsewhere. 
    Hmmmm.  Since I didn't find any deeds with Jacob Blackshear as a grantor in the Irwin County records, I decided maybe I should try to double check the information in this list to see if it was actually correct.  I went down to a Family History Center so I could look at the list of 1820 land lottery grants that was locked on the FamilySearch website.  I found this index:



    Then I went to page 148 and it wasn't the right deed!  So I double checked the index.  This index is much, much, much easier to read than most, so I knew I wasn't interpreting it wrong.  So I went back through the deeds.  For some reason, in the middle of the microfilm file, the page numbers just started all over again with page 1, and in that section, I found Jacob's land grant:



    So yes, the information in the book was correct.   I am assuming that, even though Jacob didn't receive title to the land until 1834, that doesn't mean he still lived in Twiggs County at that point.  Because remember, we have proof that he was in Houston County in 1829 and 1830.  So I guess whatever information was recorded at the time of the drawing is what was put on the land grant papers.

    So maybe when he left Twiggs, Jacob actually went to check out his land in Irwin County, instead of to hold Enoch's land in Houston County.  Or how about this - maybe he wanted to stay near his son, so he didn't want to live in Irwin County, so he never went there until later, after Enoch arrived to occupy the land in Houston, and then he went over to Irwin to check out his land in 1829, which is why he was listed as a defaulter on the tax list.  Or maybe he went between the time that he lived in Houston and Stewart, and when he got there he had to tell whoever was living on his land in Irwin and had invested time building a house and clearing fields, pay up or I will take all of this and they agreed so he paid the fee to get title and then sold the land and got the money that he and Silas used to buy the land in Stewart County that they were living on in 1840.  (Whew!  I guess anything's possible!  All we do know is that he wasn't living in Irwin between 1830 - 1832, because he doesn't show up in the tax lists.)

    And while I'm talking about Jacob's land lottery successes, here is another bit of information to get you all confused:  I just discovered that the Blacksheariana reports that Jacob was a fortunate drawer in the 1832 lottery as well, which he entered as a resident of Sinclair's district in Houston County.  I haven't found any confirmation of this, because for some reason the section from which he drew is not on any of the online lists, but maybe Perry Blackshear was privy to some documents that I haven't found, so I'm going to take his word for it.  The problem is, Jacob did not appear in the Houston County tax digest for 1831.  So why would we expect him to be there in 1832?  Enoch was living in Sinclair's district in 1831, and I know I told you those names changed every year, but a popular captain would have been elected multiple years in a row.  So, maybe Jacob was over in Irwin County in 1831, shaking down the guy who had settled on his previous land lottery lot!  (So much for having figured out a possible timeline!)

    But back to Stewart County - how do we know they actually owned that land?  Well, there is one tax digest available online for Stewart County, and it is for the year 1841:



    Silas is the very first name on the page. (His initials are used, even though they weren't supposed to do that.)  Remember, Silas was listed as a head of household and had both of his parents living with him on the 1840 census.  The headings on this one are Land, Number, District, Quality, Pine, Pole, Town Property, Stock & Trade, Money at Interest, Four Wheel Carriage, Lawyers, Dr. or M. C. (I think?), $, Cents, and M.

    Here is a close-up so you can read what was recorded for Silas:


    He had 175 acres of land, lot number 57 in district 20.  The quality of the land was 2 (out of 3), and it was in Stewart County.  The land is not specified as being pine land.  He was assessed one pole, which means he had no slaves.  (Free men and slaves under the age of 60 were assessed a pole tax.  Jacob would have been too old to be taxed at this point, so the fact that he is not on the list does not mean he had moved away or died.)  Nothing else is marked, except for the tax amounts and the column "M," but I have absolutely no idea what that means.  Oh, and that $979 at the top is what was carried over from the previous page totals, not what Silas actually owed in taxes!

    The cool thing about this is that we now have enough of a description that we know almost exactly where the family lived.  I hate to keep sending you back to look at the map, so I copied the relevant portion for you (yay!):


    The front of the tax digest said that it was the book for the Lumpkin area.  You can see that town on the map.  Silas lived in district 20, which is the box outlined in the bottom center of the county.  But we can do even better.  He owned 175 acres within lot 57.  So where was that exactly?

    Here is a militia district map showing all of the lots in district 20:



    I don't remember where I got this map, but it is basically a copy of the original Lee County survey map for District 20 (because Stewart was formed out of Lee, remember?).   If you click on it (or the title) to get an enlarged view, you will see that lot 57 is near the center almost at the very bottom.  (In case you notice that lots 1-32 are missing, that is because the bottom of the twentieth district was not included in the new Stewart County.)

    And here is a close-up of lot 57 from the original Lee County survey map:


    Stewart County
    District 20, Lot 57

    You'll see how the western side of the lot was covered in pine, and there is the branch of a river running through part of it.  I don't know what the letters in the eastern corners stand for, but I do know they are all types of trees. (I looked through the actual field survey book and it lists all the types of trees so the surveyor could put them on his map.  The "B.g. might stand for "black gum," but I don't know what the "p" on the end would be.)  The tax record says that Silas only held 175 out of the 202 1/2 acres in lot 57.  The column for Pine was not checked, so either he didn't own the western portion, or most of the pine trees had been cut down in the fourteen years since this map was made.

    I actually found the deed in which Silas sold this piece of land (I didn't find a deed for the purchase, so I don't think the lack of a deed of sale for the Irwin County land means much.)  You'd think we could use that to tell exactly which part of lot 57 was his, right?  Well.  Check this out:




    And here is a close-up of the section with the description of the land being sold:


    I know this is hard to read.  It doesn't really get much better when you enlarge it.  So here is a transcription for you.  If anyone else decides to give it a try and comes up with a different version, let me know!
    ...heirs and assigns all that tract or parcel of land situate lying and being in the (20th) twentieth District of originally Lee now Stewart Known and distinguished in the plan of said District By the number 57th) fifty seven containing one hundred sixty six and half acres more or less the south boundary to commence near the south east corner say at a shed (?) of Green Lewis formerly but now belonging to Gustavus DeSannag run a western course and strike an oak stump right where the road leaves the fence and direct from that point to the southwest corner of said lot with all the rights members and appurtenances ....
    Seriously?  That's the legal description of his land?  I mean, I know that it was originally surveyed using the (primitive) ball and chain method (hence the scale "40 chains to an inch" on the original map), but still.  That was totally unhelpful in helping us pin down the exact location.  And what happened when the shed burned down or the fence fell over or got moved?  How was the new owner supposed to prove what was his?

    I also noticed that the deed is for less land than what the 1841 taxes showed that he owned, so at some point he must have sold eight and a half acres of the original tract.

    The date at the bottom of the deed is January 19, 1849, but that is the date it was recorded.  In the actual wording of the deed, it says that the land was sold for $666 dollars on January 19, 1848.  I though maybe this might be one of those times that somebody forgot it was a new year, being January and all, because it seemed a bit fishy that it would get recorded exactly a year to the day later, but the next deed in the book has the same dating discrepancy.  This means that Silas had been living in Stewart County for at least eight years, and perhaps even as long as fifteen years.  That is probably the longest that he'd ever lived in the same place in his whole life.  This could be due to the fact that he had his aging parents living with him, but also because he had six children by 1845, which is an awfully big family to be dragging around!

    And that's it for Georgia.  We won't see the family again until 1850 in Arkansas, but the fact that they sold their land at the beginning of 1848 tells me that that is probably when they actually moved.

    At least we pinned down one date that I can feel good about adding to the timeline!

    And now, in conclusion, I have the following thoughts:
    I am still marginally confused!  (How about you?  Trying to make sense of all these bits and pieces of information was a nightmare.  Let me know if any of my reasoning doesn't make sense!)
    These people were kind of nuts!  Why would anyone want to move to an entirely new place every five years, where, unless they were lucky enough to draw a lot that had been formerly occupied by a member of the Creek tribe (in which case there might actually be a home and cleared fields waiting for them), they would have to clear land and build a new house?
    I guess it is no wonder that Silas decided to move to Texas shortly after it became a state, when the Native Americans were being pushed further west and settlers were being actively recruited - moving on to newly opened lands was practically all he had ever known!

    And next time, we'll look at the records I've found from the family's time in Arkansas and Texas.


                                                                                                                                                Therese